Myths or Reality: Pashtun Indigenous Communities Resistance to State Authority in Colonial and Post-Colonial Era
Keywords:
Cultural Stereotypes, Pashtun Resistance, Colonization, Post-colonial, Pashtun NationalismAbstract
Pashtun resistance to state authority has been interpreted in light of stereotypical colonial theories in colonial and post-colonial periods. Pashtuns were presented as marshals and wild people who resisted every kind of state authority in the colonial era. Perceptions about Pashtun’s resistance to state authority based on politically motivated stereotypes resonate in the British colonial regime. This study focuses on the stereotypes and myths associated with Pashtun's resistance to state authority in the colonial period and its effect on them in post-colonial periods. The British colonial regime faced resistance in the Pashtun indigenous society (now known as emerged districts). The findings of this study reveal that the Pashtun resistance to state authority is not part of their culture. Pashtun were against the exploitative policies of the British and it was genuine resistance. It reveals that their resistance was labelled as a normative part of their culture to legitimize the oppressive policies in this region. Moreover, in the post-colonial period, Pakistan also applied the same tactics and labelled genuine resistance as part of their culture. Stereotypes associated with Pashtun's resistance to the state should be deconstructed.
References
Akhtar, A. S. (2022). The checkpost state in Pakistan’s War of Terror: Centres, peripheries, and the politics of the universal. Antipode, 54(5), 1365-1385.
Ali, H. & Zhibin, H. (2021). A Comparative Analysis of Mahsud and Afridi Tribe Resistance Movement Against the British 1849-1897. European Journal of Humanities and Educational Advancements, 2(9), 34-41
Arbab, S. (2019). The ecstasy and anarchy of nonviolence: The Khudai Khidmatgar resistance in the north-west frontier of British India. University of California, Los Angeles.
Asif, D. M. (2024). THE COMPLEXITIES OF BIOTERRORISM: CHALLENGES AND CONSIDERATIONS. International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences, 3(3), 2175–2184. Retrieved from https://ijciss.org/index.php/ijciss/article/view/1391
Bala, S. (2013). Waging Nonviolence: Reflections on the history writing of the Pashtun nonviolent movement Khudai Khidmatgar. Peace & Change, 38(2), 131-154.
Bangash, S. (2015). Tribal Belt and the Defence of British India: A Critical Appraisal of British Strategy in the North-West Frontier during the First World War. Journal of the Pakistan Historical Society, 2, 63.
Bansode, R. (2020). Book Review: Ground Down by Growth: Tribe, Caste, Class, and Inequality in Twenty-First-Century India. Sociological Research Online, 25(1), 154-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780419830099.
BATY, E. (1980). British policy and the Pashtun experience before the South Asian partition. Britis Undergraduate History, 21(2), 1.
Borthakur, A. (202). The Pashtun Trajectory: From the Colonially Constructed Notion on ‘Violent’Pashtun Tribe to ‘Non Violent’Pashtun Tahafuz Movement. Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, 15(3), 360-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/25765949.2021.1992584
Caroe, O. (1960). The Pathans. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, 108(5052), 920-939.
Cherniak, K. (2021). Sociology from the Global South and the Global North: Systematising characteristics and relations. Соціологічні студії, (1 (18)).
Epstein, C. (2014). The postcolonial perspective: an introduction. International Theory, 6(2), 294-311
Eswarappa, K. (2024). The complexity of the “Tribal” question in India: The case of the particularly vulnerable tribal groups. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 59(3), 858-875.
Green, N. (2016). Afghanistan’s Islam: from conversion to the Taliban (p. 354). University of California Press.
Gregory, D. (2004). The Colonial Present: Afghanistan. Palestine. Iraq. John Wiley & Sons.
Hakur, M. K. (2013). Book Review: Writing India: Colonial Ethnography in the Nineteenth Century. Sociological Research Online, 18(2), 225-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/136078041301800203
Hanifi, S.M. (2016). The Pashtun counter-narrative. Middle East Critique, 25(4), 385-400.
Haroon, S., & Green, N. (2017). Competing views of Pashtun Tribalism, Islam, and society in the Indo-Afghan borderlands. Afghanistan’s Islam: From Conversion to the Taliban. Oakland: University of California Press. doi, 10, 9780520967373-014.
Hussain, I., Xingang, W., & Fatima, A. (2022). British Colonial Imperialism and Pashtun Resistance
Jamil Hanifi, M. (2011). Review Essay: Vending distorted Afghanistan through patriotic ‘anthropology’. Critique of Anthropology, 31(3), 256-270.
Khan, A. (2020). The British Colonial Policies in the North West Frontier of India: 1849-1901. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 14(2), 164-179.
Khan, I., Israr, M., & Khan, Z. (2019). Pakhtun radicalization in fata: A qualitative approach for their effective integration in Pakistan. JL & Soc'y, 50, 73.
Khan, U., Cheng, Y., Shah, Z.A., Ullah, S., & Jianfu, M. (2021). Reclaiming Pashtun Identity: The role of informal spaces in developing an alternative narrative. Interventions, 23(8), 1166-1186. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2020.1845769
Khan, U., Cheng, Y., Shah, Z. A., & Ullah, S. (2020). Resistance in disguise and the re-construction of identity: a case of the Pashtuns in Pakistan. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 21(3), 374-391.
Kharroubi, L. (2022). To What Extent Did The Anti-Colonial Struggle Impact Pashtuns Leading Up to South Asia’s Parti-tion?. Historia Nova, 12.
Kiwanuka, M. S. (2018). Colonial policies and administrations in Africa: The myths of the contrasts. In The colonial epoch in Africa (pp. 1-22). Routledge.
Leonard, Z. (2016). Colonial Ethnography on India's North-West Frontier, 1850–1910. The Historical Journal, 59(1), 175-196.
Lundberg, C.E. (2016). From Defeat to Glory: The First Anglo-Afghan War and the Lindholm, C., 1980. Images of the Pathan: The usefulness of colonial ethnography. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 21(2), 350-361.
Mahmud, T. (2010). Colonial Cartographies, Postcolonial Borders, and Enduring Failures of International Law: The Unending War along the Afghanistan-Pakistan Frontier. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 20(1), 10-11.
Manderson, D. (2012). The Law of the Image and the Image of the Law: Colonial Representations of the Rule of Law. NYL Sch. L. Rev., 57, p.153.
Mir, N.A. (2018). Pashtun nationalism in search of political space and the state in Pakistan. Strategic Analysis, 42(4), 443-450.
Mische, A. (2011). Relational sociology, culture, and agency. The Sage handbook of social network analysis, 80-97.
Nimesh, A. (2022). The Idea of Self-Governance and Tribal Revolts in Colonial Period. In Tribe, Space and Mobilisation: Colonial Dynamics and Post-Colonial Dilemma in Tribal Studies (pp. 133-150). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Pant, S. (2018). The Frontier Crimes Regulation in Colonial India: Local Critiques and Persistent Effects. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 41(4), pp.789-805
Pathmavathy, M. B. (2024). EXPLORING THE NEGLECTED NARRATIVES OF TRIBAL RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS AGAINST COLONIALISM IN INDIA. Journal of Digital Economy, 3(1), 424-431.
Reynolds, J. (2016). Empire, emergency and the law. International Community Law Review, 3(3), pp.4-6.
Saeed, S., Shah, R. and ul ain Jafeer, Q. (2020). Colonial Literary Sources and the Image of Pashtuns: A Historical Analysis. Journal of Asian Civilizations, 43(2), 201-213.
Saikal, A. (2010). Afghanistan and Pakistan: The Question of Pashtun Nationalism?. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 30(1), pp.5-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602001003650572
Siddique, A. (2014). The Pashtun question: The unresolved key to the future of Pakistan and Afghanistan. Hurst & Company.
Sohail, M., Ahmad, S. M., & Inamullah, H. M. (2014). The Educational Services and Philosophy of Bacha Khan. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci, 4(7S), 157-165.
Sōkefeld, M. (2005). From colonialism to postcolonial colonialism: changing modes of domination in the Northern areas of Pakistan. The Journal of Asian Studies, 64(4), 939-973.
Tripodi, C. (2016). Edge of empire: The British political officer and tribal administration on the north-west frontier 1877–1947. Routledge.
Ullah, A., Hayat, R. and Khan, F.U. (2021). Khudai Khidmatgars’ Resistance against Colonial Rule and its Search for Affiliation. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 5(2), 661-672.
Vázquez, R. (2009). Modernity coloniality and visibility: The politics of the time. Sociological Research Online, 14(4), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1990
Verghese, A. (2016). British rule and tribal revolts in India: The curious case of Bastar. Modern Asian Studies, 50(5), 1619-1644.
Wagner, K.A. (2013). Edge of Empire. The British Political Officer and Tribal Administration on the North-West Frontier 1877–1947. By Christian Tripodi.
White, J.T. (2008). The shape of frontier rule: Governance and transition, from the Raj to the modern Pakistani frontier. Asian Security, 4(3), 219-243.
Williams, S. and Law, I. (2012). Legitimising racism: An exploration of the challenges posed by the use of indigeneity discourses by the far right. Sociological Research Online, 17(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2554
Yousaf, F. (2019). Pakistan’s “tribal” Pashtuns, their “violent” representation, and the Pashtun Tahafuz movement. Sage Open, 9(1), 2158244019829546.
Yousaf, F. (2021). The ‘savage’Pathan (Pashtun) and the postcolonial burden. Critical Studies on Security, 9(1), 3.
Yousaf, F. and Wakhu, S. (2020). Security in the ‘Periphery’of post-colonial states: analyzing Pakistan’s ‘tribal’Pashtuns and Kenyan-Somalis. Social Identities, 26(4), 515-532 https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2020.1776599
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zafar Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The work is concurrently licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship and the work's original publication in this journal, while the authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.