Do Reforms Fix Inefficiency? Evidence of Value and Accrual Anomalies from the Saudi Vision 2030 Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v5i3.290Keywords:
Saudi Vision 2030, Adaptive Market Hypothesis, Value-Glamour, Accrual Anomaly, Market Efficiency, Emerging MarketsAbstract
This study investigates the informational efficiency of the Saudi Stock Exchange (Tadawul) during the structural reforms of Saudi Vision 2030 by jointly testing value-glamour and accrual anomalies through the lens of the Adaptive Market Hypothesis. Using an unbalanced panel of 1,545 non-financial firm-year observations over 2010–2024, we apply Fama-MacBeth cross-sectional regressions with lagged accounting variables to prevent look-ahead bias. Size-adjusted returns are regressed on book-to-market (B/M) and total balance-sheet accruals, controlling for size, leverage, and momentum. We find a robust value premium (B/M β = 0.058, p < 0.01) and, notably, a positive relation between lagged accruals and future returns (β = 0.042, p < 0.01). This sign reversal from developed markets suggests that Saudi investors interpret high accruals as a signal of genuine investment and growth rather than earnings management. Both anomalies remain significant when tested jointly, and sub-period analysis reveals that although their magnitude diminished by 30–40% after the 2017 QFI and IFRS reforms, they persist. This persistence, alongside the independence of the two anomalies, indicates that prices do not fully reflect all public information, contrary to semi-strong EMH, and that investors respond to distinct valuation and earnings-quality signals. The findings align with the Adaptive Market Hypothesis: regulatory modernization outpaces the cognitive adaptation of the retail-dominated investor base, making efficiency evolutionary. The study provides the first joint pre- and post-Vision 2030 evidence of a positive accrual anomaly and highlights the continued viability of fundamental, factor-based strategies. It also underscores the need for targeted investor education to accelerate cognitive modernization and close the gap between structural transparency and efficient price discovery.
References
Abraham, A. (2013). The efficiency of GCC stock markets. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, 34(4), 1-28.
Al-Hajia, A., Al-Khazali, O., & Al-Zoubi, H. (2023). Investor sentiment and market anomalies in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 24(3), 312-328.
Asiri, A., Alfardan, S., & Liston, D. P. (2025). The Adaptive Market Hypothesis for the Saudi Stock Market: A Sectoral Indices Analysis. Research Square.
Bahloul, S., & Ben Amar, A. (2024). Market depth and efficiency in the post-reform Saudi Exchange. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 91, 12-24.
Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. (2000). Foreign speculators and emerging equity markets. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 565-613.
Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2011). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 344-401.
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56.
Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. The Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1541-1578.
Lo, A. W. (2004). The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis. Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(5), 15-29.
Matoussi, H., & Mostafa, W. (2016). Accruals quality and stock return: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 12(2), 70-101.
Pincus, M., Rajgopal, S., & Venkatachalam, M. (2007). The accrual anomaly: International evidence. The Accounting Review, 82(1), 169-203.
Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136.
Saudi Tadawul Group. (2025). Annual Report 2024: Creating an Advanced Capital Market. Riyadh: Saudi Tadawul Group.
Sehgal, S., Subramaniam, S., & Deisting, F. (2012). Value effect in Indian stock market: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, 4(2), 162-180.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). The limits of arbitrage. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 35-55.
Sloan, R. G. (1996). Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? The Accounting Review, 71(3), 289-315.
Zhang, X. F. (2007). Accruals, investment, and the accrual anomaly. The Accounting Review, 82(5), 1333-1363.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Fahad Malik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The work is concurrently licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship and the work's original publication in this journal, while the authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.