Behind Bars for the First Time: A Phenomenological Study of Psychological and Social Vulnerabilities of First-Time Offenders in District Prison Faisalabad, Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v5i3.297Keywords:
First-Time Offenders, Prison Experience, Psychological Vulnerability, Prison Adjustment, Hardened Offenders, Qualitative Study, Faisalabad Prison, PakistanAbstract
First-time offenders are one of the most vulnerable groups in prisons because they are taken into prison for the first time to a highly restricted environment with unfamiliar prison culture, prison routines, and prison hierarchy, where they do not have a previous experience to rely on to help them adjust, so they are emotionally stressed and have difficulties in adjusting. The study was designed to investigate the social, psychological, and economic problems of first-time offenders, their relations with hardened or repeat offenders, problems faced in prison, and needs experienced during the first time in prison, and the important psychological stress factors of first-time imprisonment. The design used in this study is a qualitative research design, which is used to gain an in-depth understanding of the lived experiences of inmates. The data was gathered by conducting semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 25 first-time offenders, who were selected through purposive sampling in District Prison Faisalabad. Thematic analysis was then used to uncover key themes and patterns emerging from the data around prison experiences and vulnerabilities. Overall, the study revealed that imprisonment is an emotionally and socially challenging experience for first-time offenders with feelings of fear, anxiety, loneliness, uncertainty, and isolation, particularly in the early stages. The participants expressed difficulty adapting to the rules of the prison, the poor living conditions, and living together, making them feel insecure and helpless.
References
Akhtar, S., Shah, S. W. A., Rafiq, M., & Khan, A. (2016). Research design and statistical methods in Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences (PJMS). Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 32(1), 151.
Allmark, P., Boote, J., Chambers, E., Clarke, A., McDonnell, A., Thompson, A., & Tod, A. M. (2009). Ethical issues in the use of in-depth interviews: literature review and discussion. Research Ethics, 5(2), 48-54.
Andrade, A. L. M., Scatena, A., Martins, G. D. G., de Oliveira Pinheiro, B., da Silva, A. B., Enes, C. C., ... & Kim, D. J. (2020). Validation of smartphone addiction scale–Short version (SAS-SV) in Brazilian adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 110, 106540.
Austin, R. (2004). The shame of it all: Stigma and the political disenfranchisement of formerly convicted and incarcerated persons. Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev., 36, 173-185
Aronno, M. S. R., Zumma, M. T., Prodhan, R., Zohora, F. T., Sakib, N., & Tahmiduzzaman, K. B. M. (2023, July). A study of cyber bullying classification using Social Media and Texual analysis based on Machine Learning Approches. In 2023 14th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Basit, T. (2003). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research, 45(2), 143–154.
Clemmer, D. (1940). The prison community. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Crewe, B. (2009). The prisoner society: Power, adaptation and social life in an English prison. Oxford University Press.
Edgar, K., O'Donnell, I., & Martin, C. (2003). Prison Violence: The dynamics of conflict. Fear and Power, Cullompton: Willan.
Eshra, S. A., Zohora, F. T., Akter, S., Rasul, I., & Hossain, A. (2025). The role of threat intelligence in preventing financially motivated cyberattacks. Journal of Engineering and Computational Intelligence Review, 3(2), 20-37.
Farakh, N., Ullah, M. K., Javed, Y., & Suhail, M. H. (2025). Life Behind Bars: A Study of the Psychological, Social, and Emotional Conditions of Prison Inmates in Pakistan. Journal of Social Sciences Research & Policy, 3(04), 613-621.
Fazel, S., Hayes, A. J., Bartellas, K., Clerici, M., & Trestman, R. (2016). Mental health of prisoners: Prevalence, adverse outcomes, and interventions. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(9), 871–881.
Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064.
Gooch, K. (2025). ‘They’ll Do Harsh Shit in Here’: The Anatomy and Culture of Prison Victimisation. In Prison Violence: The Search for Recognition and Respect (pp. 61-95). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Gul, R., Muhammad, B., & Hussain, R. (2021). An Analysis of the Risk-Need-Responsivity Model to Reform Pakistan's Prisons. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 13(3).
Haney, C. (2001). The psychological impact of incarceration: Implications for post-prison adjustment. Urban Institute Press
Hidayat, N., Andriani, F., & Yoenanto, N. H. (2024). Exploring challenges and strategies for improving the quality of education: Integrative literature review. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 7(1), 128-141.
Holdenson, Z., Catanzariti, L., Phillips, G., & Waters, A. M. (2003). A picture of diabetes in overseas-born Australians. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
Islam, M. T., Azeem, A., Jabir, M., Paul, A., & Paul, S. K. (2022). An inventory model for a three-stage supply chain with random capacities considering disruptions and supplier reliability. Annals of Operations Research, 315(2), 1703-1728.
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.
Kazmi, S. M. A., & Ismail, M. (2024). Mental health of prison inmates: validation and measurement invariance of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS). Current psychology, 43(32), 26154-26166.
Leban, L., Cardwell, S. M., Copes, H., & Brezina, T. (2016). Adapting to prison life: A qualitative examination of the coping process among incarcerated offenders. Justice Quarterly, 33(6), 943-969.
Liebling, A. (2014). Postscript: Integrity and emotion in prison research. Qualitative inquiry, 20(4), 481-486.
Liebling, A., & Arnold, H. (2012). Social relationships between prisoners in a maximum security prison: Violence, faith, and the declining nature of trust. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(5), 413-424.
Mahmood, H. Z., Khan, R., Mehmood, B., & Khan, K. (2014). Efficiency analysis of conventional vs. Islamic microfinance: An appraisal for sustainability in Pakistan. International Journal of Empirical Finance, 3(4), 192-201.
Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. American Psychological Association.
Maxwell, Y., Day, A., & Casey, S. (2013). Understanding the needs of vulnerable prisoners: The role of social and emotional wellbeing. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 9(2), 57–67.
Ministry of Justice. (2008). Prison population projections. http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/docs/stats-prison-pop-sep08.pdf
Schnittker, J. (2014). The psychological dimensions and the social consequences of incarceration. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 651(1), 122-138.
Souza, K. A., & Dhami, M. K. (2010). First-time and recurrent inmates’ experiences of imprisonment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(12), 1330-1342.
Steiner, B., Ellison, J. M., Butler, H. D., & Cain, C. M. (2017). Examining the causes and correlates of prison victimization: A systematic review of the literature. Justice Quarterly. 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1402072
Sutherland, E. H., Cressey, D. R., & Luckenbill, D. F. (1992). Principles of criminology. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton University Press.
Tewksbury, R. (2012). Stigmatization of sex offenders. Deviant Behavior, 33(8), 606–623.
Tareque, T., Tousif, F., Billah, M., Jabir, A. and Mirmotalebi, S. (2023) Comprehensive Analysis of the Effects of Superplasticizer Variation on the Workability and Strength of Ready-Mix Concrete. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 13, 756-770. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2023.134050
Ullah, R. (2024). Systemic Barriers to Prisoner Rehabilitation in Pakistan: A Case Study of District Jail Sargodha. ResearchGate.
Ullah, R. (2024). Systemic Barriers to Prisoner Rehabilitation in Pakistan: A Case Study of District Jail Sargodha. ResearchGate.
Walmsley, R. (2009). World prison population list (8th ed.). International Centre for Prison Studies.
Western, B., Braga, A. A., Davis, J., & Sirois, C. (2015). Stress and hardship after prison. American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), 1512-1547.
Wolff, N., & Shi, J. (2009). Feelings of safety inside prison among male inmates with different victimization experiences. Violence and Victims, 24(6), 800–816.
Wooldredge, J., & Steiner, B. (2014). A bi-level framework for understanding prisoner victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(1), 141–162.
World Health Organization. (2009). Women’s health in prison: Correcting gender inequity in prison health.
Yang, S., Kadouri, A., Révah-Lévy, A., Mulvey, E. P., & Falissard, B. (2009). Doing time: A qualitative study of long-term incarceration and the impact of mental illness. International journal of law and psychiatry, 32(5), 294-303.
Zahid, I., & Ullah, R. (2026). Legal, Institutional, and Technological Development in Forensic Science in Pakistan. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v5i3.282
Zamble, E., & Porporino, F. J. (2013). Coping, behavior, and adaptation in prison inmates. Springer Science & Business Media.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sabeeha Safdar, Rooh Ullah, Muhammad Hussain

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The work is concurrently licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship and the work's original publication in this journal, while the authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.