Innovating with AI: How Innovative Attitude, Peer Influence, and Task-Technology Fit Shape AI Appropriation in Project Management

Authors

  • Adil Naseer MS Scholar, Department of Project Management and Supply Chain Management, Bahria University Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Shahid Iqbal Professor, Department of Project Management and Supply Chain Management, Bahria University Islamabad. Pakistan
  • Ehtasham Ul Haq Researcher/Accounts Officer, Quaid-i- Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v5i2.273

Keywords:

AI Appropriation, Innovation Attitude, Task-Technology Fit, Generative AI, Adaptive Structuration Theory

Abstract

The rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools is reshaping project management practices, yet significant variation remains in how professionals creatively appropriate these technologies. This study investigates the drivers of AI appropriation in project management by integrating Adaptive Structuration Theory (AST) with Task–Technology Fit (TTF) theory. The research examines how innovation attitude, peer influence, and task–technology fit influence AI-enabled creative behaviour, while also assessing the moderating role of organizational culture. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted among 234 project management professionals working in Pakistan’s information technology and logistics sectors. Data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that task–technology fit is the strongest predictor of creative AI appropriation, followed by innovation attitude and peer influence. Furthermore, organizational culture significantly strengthens the relationships between these antecedents and creative behaviour, highlighting its role as a contextual amplifier of AI-enabled innovation. The model explains 71.5% of the variance in creative behaviour, demonstrating substantial explanatory power. The study contributes to the literature by extending AST to generative AI contexts, empirically integrating AST and TTF in a unified framework, and providing evidence from an emerging economy with collectivist cultural characteristics. Practically, the findings suggest that organizations seeking to leverage AI for innovative project outcomes should prioritize task-aligned AI tools, cultivate innovation-oriented mindsets among professionals, and develop supportive organizational cultures that encourage experimentation and collaborative learning.

References

Alam, I., Waheed, K. Z., & Rehman, M. S. (2024). The impact of cultural diversity on workforce efficiency in private banking sector of Pakistan. Journal of Workplace Behavior, 5(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.70580/jwb.05.01.0218

Balash, F., Ghooja, S., & Talab, A. S. (2018). The rankings of involvement and consistency in line with academic research ethics. In European proceedings of social and behavioural sciences (pp. 72–80). https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.05.7

Barcaui, A., & Monat, A. (2023). Who is smarter? Generative artificial intelligence versus project managers in project risk identification. Project Management Journal, 54(5), 455–467.

Bayaga, A. (2025). Leveraging AI-enhanced and emerging technologies for pedagogical innovations in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1045–1072.

Cao, G., Duan, Y., & Edwards, J. S. (2025). Organizational culture, digital transformation, and product innovation. Information & Management, 62(4), 104135.

Chen, J., Xie, W., Xie, Q., Hu, A., Qiao, Y., Wan, R., & Liu, Y. (2025). A systematic review of user attitudes toward GenAI: Influencing factors and industry perspectives. Journal of Intelligence, 13(7), 78.

Ciftci, O., Berezina, K., & Kang, M. (2021). Effect of personal innovativeness on technology adoption in hospitality and tourism: Meta-analysis. In Information and communication technologies in tourism 2021 (pp. 162–174).

Cimino, A., Felicetti, A. M., Corvello, V., Ndou, V., & Longo, F. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in innovation management: A study on the appropriation of ChatGPT by innovation managers. Management Decision, 63(10), 3431–3453.

Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. Wiley.

Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204–223.

Dennis, A. R., Wixom, B. H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2001). Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 167–193.

DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147.

Dong, X., Tian, Y., He, M., & Wang, T. (2024). When knowledge workers meet AI? The double-edged sword effects of AI adoption on innovative work behavior. Journal of Knowledge Management, 29(1), 113–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-02-2024-0222

Felicetti, A. M., Cimino, A., Corvello, V., Ndou, V., & Longo, F. (2024). Appropriating ChatGPT in project management: A study among Italian project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 42(3), 102576.

Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. University of California Press.

Golden, J. H., & Shriner, M. (2017). Examining relationships between transformational leadership and employee creative performance: The moderator effects of organizational culture. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.216

Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.

Gursoy, D., Chi, O. H., Lu, L., & Nunkoo, R. (2019). Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 157–169.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.

Hartl, E., Nawrath, D., & Hess, T. (2018). Refining the influence of organizational culture on individual IS adoption. In Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Association for Information Systems.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.

Hossain, M. A., Akter, S., & Nagahashi, N. (2024). Generative AI in project management: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 42(5), 102589.

Hughes, L., Mavi, R. K., Aghajani, M., Fitzpatrick, K., Gunaratnege, S. M., Shekarabi, S. A. H., Hughes, R., Khanfar, A., Khatavakhotan, A., & Mavi, N. K. (2025). Impact of artificial intelligence on project management (PM): Multi-expert perspectives on advancing knowledge and driving innovation toward PM2030. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(5), 100772.

Jain, R., Garg, N., & Khera, S. N. (2022). Adoption of AI-enabled tools in social development organizations in India: An extension of UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.893691

Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.

Jo, H., & Bang, Y. (2023). Analyzing ChatGPT adoption drivers with the TOEK framework. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49710-0

Khan, A., Khan, A., Shah, T. A., Khattak, M. N., & Abukhait, R. (2023). Management's internal governance policies on flexible work practices and the mediating lens of work-life enrichment. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 11(3), 532–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-02-2023-0059

Lin, T.-C., & Huang, C.-C. (2008). Understanding knowledge management system usage antecedents: An integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit. Information & Management, 45(6), 410–417.

Lu, Z., Li, P., Wang, W., & Yin, M. (2025). Understanding the effects of AI-based credibility indicators when people are influenced by both peers and experts. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–19).

Mahmood, S., Mehmood, H., & Waheed, K. Z. (2024). The influence of despotic leadership on counterproductive work behavior: The role of follower’s dispositional characteristics. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(2), 1826–1841. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2024.v12i2.2305

McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376–390.

Mohajan, H. K. (2020). Quantitative research: A successful investigation in natural and social sciences. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v9i4.679

Mokhchy, J., Chen, G., Ahmad, S., Khan, Y. A., Zhang, J., & Ahmed, M. (2025). Dynamic impact of leadership style, knowledge-sharing, and organizational culture on organizational performance. Current Psychology, 44(6), 4097–4112.

Nenni, M. E., De Felice, F., De Luca, C., & Forcina, A. (2025). How artificial intelligence will transform project management in the age of digitization: A systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 75(2), 1669–1716.

Nevo, S., Nevo, D., & Pinsonneault, A. (2020). Exploring the role of IT in the front-end of innovation: An empirical study of IT-enabled creative behavior. Information and Organization, 30(4), 100322.

Oh, K., Kho, H.-S., Choi, Y.-J., & Seogjun, L. (2022). Determinants for successful digital transformation. Sustainability, 14(3), 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031215

Pan, X., Wu, Y., & Liu, C. (2023). How peer influence shapes the adoption of AI-based recommendation systems: A social influence perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, 107574.

Park, Y. S., Konge, L., & Artino, A. R. (2020). The positivism paradigm of research. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 690–694.

Patil, P. P., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., & Raghavan, V. (2020). Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: Extending meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102144

Peng, Y., Ahmad, S. F., Irshad, M., Al-Razgan, M., Ali, Y. A., & Awwad, E. M. (2023). Impact of digitalization on process optimization and decision-making towards sustainability: The moderating role of environmental regulation. Sustainability, 15(20), 15156. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015156

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M. (2025a). Between adoption and ambiguity: Navigating the AI policy vacuum in Pakistani higher education. Research Journal for Social Affairs, 3(6), 877–885. https://doi.org/10.71317/RJSA.003.06.0523

Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M. (2025b). Use of artificial intelligence in school management: A contemporary need of school education system in Punjab (Pakistan). Journal of Asian Development Studies, 14(2), 1984–2009. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2025.14.2.56

Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M., Bukhari, S. T., Malik, N., Rehman, L., & Qamar, A. H. (2025a). Gender differences in the use and challenges of breakthrough technology in higher education: Evidence from Punjab. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(3), 1056–1073. https://doi.org/10.59075/hpdvq714

Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M., Malik, N., & Bano, S. (2025b). Learning to innovate: WhatsApp groups as grassroots innovation ecosystems among micro-entrepreneurs in emerging markets. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 14(1), 1854–1862. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2025.14.1.47

Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M., Shih, Y.-H., & Akomodi, J. O. (2026). Integrating emotional intelligence and AI-driven learning in higher education: Implications for student well-being and university HR policies. The Study of Religion and History, 4(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.63163/srh300

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). Free Press.

Saghafian, M., Laumann, K., & Skogstad, M. R. (2021). Stagewise overview of issues influencing organizational technology adoption and use. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 630145.

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Shao, Z., & Li, X. (2022). Investigating the role of IS management sophistication in IT infrastructure capability and business process agility: An empirical study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 122(6), 1455–1480.

Shoushtari, F., Daghighi, A., & Ghafourian, E. (2024). Application of artificial intelligence in project management. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operational Research, 6(2), 49–63.

Stojčić, N., Hashi, I., & Orlić, E. (2018). Creativity, innovation effectiveness and productive efficiency in the UK. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(4), 564–580. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-11-2017-0166

Taboada, I., Daneshpajouh, A., De Toledo, N., & De Weerdt, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence enabled project management: A systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 13(8), 5014.

Thao, N. T. P. (2025). How organizational culture influences digital transformation success: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research, 170, 114312.

Trenerry, B., Chng, S., Wang, Y., Suhaila, Z. S., Lim, S. S., Lu, H., & Oh, P. H. (2021). Preparing workplaces for digital transformation: An integrative review and framework of multi-level factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766

Valerio, M. A., Redondo, N., Winkler, P., Lopez, J., Dennison, M., Liang, Y., & Turner, B. J. (2016). Comparing two sampling methods to engage hard-to-reach communities in research priority setting. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0242-z

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376.

Vergara, D., del Bosque, A., Lampropoulos, G., & Fernández-Arias, P. (2025). Trends and applications of artificial intelligence in project management. Electronics, 14(4), 800.

Waheed, K. Z., & Khan, M. I. (2025a). Fostering innovative work behavior in new product development projects: A theoretical review. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 13(2), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2025.v13i2.2884

Waheed, K. Z., & Khan, M. I. (2025b). Fostering innovative work behavior in new product development projects: A systematic literature review. Center for Management Science Research, 3(6), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17490189

Wang, G., Obrenovic, B., Gu, X., & Godinic, D. (2025). Fear of the new technology: Investigating the factors that influence individual attitudes toward generative artificial intelligence (AI). Current Psychology, 1–18.

Wang, S.-F., & Chen, C.-C. (2025). Exploring drivers of AIGC-designer collaborative innovation. Sage Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251344044

Wisdom, J. P., Chor, K. H. B., Hoagwood, K. E., & Horwitz, S. M. (2014). Innovation adoption: A review of theories and constructs. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41(4), 480–502.

Wu, X., Yan, Y., Zhu, W., & Yang, N. (2024). An extended UTAUT model study on the adoption behavior of artificial intelligence technology in construction industry. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 49(2), 564–581. https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-240798

Yang, B., & Sun, Y. (2025). Improving learning performance through AI-enabled task completing and network building: Integrating task-technology fit and social-technology fit perspectives. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–21.

Author Biographies

Adil Naseer, MS Scholar, Department of Project Management and Supply Chain Management, Bahria University Islamabad, Pakistan

MS Scholar,

Department of Project Management and Supply Chain Management,

Bahria University Islamabad, Pakistan,

Email: adilnaseer6840@gmail.com

Shahid Iqbal, Professor, Department of Project Management and Supply Chain Management, Bahria University Islamabad. Pakistan

Professor,

Department of Project Management and Supply Chain Management,

Bahria University Islamabad. Pakistan

Email: siqbal.buic@bahria.edu.pk

Ehtasham Ul Haq, Researcher/Accounts Officer, Quaid-i- Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Researcher/Accounts Officer,

Quaid-i- Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

 Email: ehtasham.qau@gmail.com

Downloads

Published

30-03-2026

How to Cite

Naseer, A., Iqbal, S., & Haq, E. U. (2026). Innovating with AI: How Innovative Attitude, Peer Influence, and Task-Technology Fit Shape AI Appropriation in Project Management. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v5i2.273

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.