The Impact of Technology in the Classroom: An Insight into Students' and Teachers' Psychological Perspectives
Keywords:
Technology, Education, Learning, Classroom, Integration, EffectivenessAbstract
The integration of technology in the classroom has become increasingly popular, with many educators seeing it as a way to enhance teaching and learning. However, there is a need to understand how technology is being used and how it is impacting both students and teachers. This qualitative study aimed to explore students' and teachers' perspectives on the use of technology in the classroom. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight teachers and ten students in a high school in the United States. The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed that technology was perceived as a valuable tool for enhancing learning, but that there were also challenges associated with its use, such as technical difficulties and distractions. Additionally, students and teachers had differing opinions on how technology should be used in the classroom, with some students preferring a more traditional approach to learning. Overall, this study highlights the need for careful consideration of how technology is integrated into the classroom, as well as the importance of understanding students' and teachers' perspectives on its use.
References
Akbulut, Y., & Cardak, C. S. (2012). The advantages and challenges of using ICTs in teaching and learning processes: The case of a Turkish online university. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 87-105.
Al-Qudah, D. M., & Al-Dababneh, K. A. (2022). Investigating the impact of using educational technologies on English language teaching and learning at a higher education institution in Jordan. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 1-21.
Alqurashi, E. (2021). The Impact of Mobile Learning on EFL Students’ Vocabulary Acquisition: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(8), 36-54.
Asif, M., Adil Pasha, M., Shafiq, S., & Craine, I. (2022). Economic Impacts of Post COVID-19. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 56–65.
Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire wireless learning initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(2), 1-54.
Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2016). Educational data mining and learning analytics: Potentials and possibilities for online education. Emergence and innovation in digital learning, 83-98.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J., & Kenney, J. (2017). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 114, 121-137.
Bulger, M. E., Mayer, R. E., & Almeroth, K. C. (2019). The effects of technology on the human mind and body. In K. Peppler (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of out-of-school learning (pp. 1022-1026). SAGE Publications, Inc.
CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org/
Chen, W (2009). Integrating technology into classroom teaching: A theory-practice nexus? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 229-243.
Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). Effects of educational technology applications on reading outcomes for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 277-299.
Cho, M. H., & Her, H. (2021). Understanding the relationship between blended learning, self-regulated learning, and academic achievement: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 167, 104164.
Chong, J. L., Wong, S. C., & Lim, J. Y. (2022). Designing an E-learning system for problem-based learning in STEM education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 85-101.
Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2011). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. McGraw Hill Professional.
Davis, F. D. (2019). Technology acceptance model for education and research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1281-1304.
Dey, M. (2021). Psychological processes in language learning and teaching: Scoping review and future research directions. Journal of Psychological Perspective, 3(2), 105-110.
Díaz-Rodríguez, M. L., & Álvarez-Valdivia, I. (2020). Students' perceptions of e-learning platforms in higher education: Analysis of a satisfaction model. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 13(1), 1-13.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by "collaborative learning"? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches (pp. 1-19). Elsevier.
Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51(1), 187-199.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & York, C. S. (2007). Exemplary technology-using teachers: Perceptions of factors influencing success. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(2), 55-61.
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435.
Fullan, M. (2013). Stratosphere: Integrating technology, pedagogy, and change knowledge. Pearson.
Gewerc, A., Segura-Robles, A., & Arroyo-Cañada, F. J. (2018). Are we ready for educational robotics? A survey on teacher training needs. Computers & Education, 116, 1-17.
Gros, B. (2014). Challenges to digital game-based learning. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 525-535). Springer.
Heidig, S., & Clarebout, G. (2011). Do media interfere with learning? A review on learner control in hypermedia environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(4), 269-287.
Hodges,C (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27.
Honey, M., & Hilton, M. (2011). Learning science through computer games and simulations. National Academies Press.
Hsu, Y. C., & Wang, C. (2021). Investigating the effects of mobile learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 163, 104094.
Kizilcec, R. F., Bailenson, J. N., & Gomez, C. J. (2017). The instructor's face in video instruction: Evidence from two large-scale field studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 849.
Khan, B. H. (2018). Technology-enhanced learning: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Springer International Publishing.
Koc, M., & Bakir, N. (2019). Technology integration in education: A review of research. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 12(1), 1-14.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614.
Lee, J., & Srinivasan, S. (2012). What motivates students to learn? An examination of e-learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 5(1), 1-14.
Liu, S.-H., Liao, H.-L., & Pratt, J. A. (2010). Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 54(2), 599–609.
Mangen, A., & Velay, J. L. (2010). Digitizing literacy: Reflections on the haptics of writing. Advances in Haptics, 171-182.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Mouza, C., & Lavigne, N. C. (2016). Technology integration in K-12 contexts: Examining the process of classroom transformation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 431-441.
Muir-Herzig, R. M., & Mulder, C. M. (2018). Technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A teacher perspective. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 11(1), 1-14.
OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. OECD Publishing.
Papadakis,(2018). Greek teachers' attitudes towards information and communication technologies in education. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 735-751.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
Puentedura, R. (2014). SAMR: A model for technology integration. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/06/29/SAMRAModelForTechnologyIntegration
Redondo, R. D., & Cabrera-García, M. (2022). Augmented reality as a tool to develop reading comprehension in students with learning difficulties. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(1), 57-76.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2016). Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers’ perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 96, 1-17.
Shabani, M., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2019). Investigating the effects of technology-enhanced language learning on EFL learners' motivation and attitudes. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 12(2), 1-13.
Shahid, N., Asif, M., & Pasha, D. A. (2022). Effect of Internet Addiction on School Going Children. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 13–55.
Shin, W. S., Kim, J. E., & Kim, K. J. (2021). The effects of educational technology on student creativity: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 527-547.
Tamim, (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4-28.
Teo, T. (2015). Examining pre-service teachers' perceived usefulness, ease of use, and attitude towards educational technology: A Malaysian perspective. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 274-285.
Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Books.
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge-A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121.
Wang, Q., & Chen, L. (2019). Exploring students' attitudes towards mobile learning: A case study in China. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(7), 904-917.
Wang, Y., & Baker, R. (2015). Content-Based Adaptive Review: Effects of Time Delay and Adaptivity on Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 1070–1085.
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225.
Wenglinsky, H. (2005). Using technology wisely: The keys to success in schools. Educational Testing Service.
Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Learning in one-to-one laptop environments: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1052-1084.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tanjina Azad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The work is concurrently licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship and the work's original publication in this journal, while the authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.