Teacher Training Needs for Skill-Based Education: A Review of Competencies, Barriers, and Professional Development Gaps

Authors

  • Muhammad Rafiq-uz-Zaman Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Education, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalnagar Campus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v2i3.212

Keywords:

Teacher Training, Skill-Based Education, Competencies, Barriers, Professional Development, Gaps

Abstract

The resulting deep gap between employer requirements and student acquisition in terms of skills, and employers and students in terms of competencies, produces dire necessity in teacher training redesign. Educators are one of the key leverage points that can be developed to ensure the development of the most important 21st-century skills, such as critical thinking, collaboration, communication, and creativity, as well as digital literacy that determine the success of the workforce. However, the majority of teachers do not receive much training or professional development in skill-based pedagogy, competency models, or learning integration with technology in meaningful learning. This review analyzes the studies on skills-based education and workforce production teacher training requirements in 17+ peer-reviewed articles. The major findings have shown that: (1) The major majority of teachers lack the initial competencies needed to engage in skill-based education such as digital literacy, pedagogical innovation, and awareness of competency frameworks; (2) Teacher preparation programs and professional development are poorly equipped to focus on skill-based education, and the programs remain focused on content-based knowledge and traditional pedagogy; (3) Teachers feel substantial obstacles to innovation such as time scarcity, professional development, technological infrastructure, and institutional support; (4) Professional development is effective when it lasts longer, is based on job The review notes the following crucial areas of teacher training such as a reform-based curriculum redesign, active pedagogies, digital competence, knowledge of social-emotional learning and trauma-informed practice, system thinking and design thinking, and cultural competence and anti-racist practice development. The review draws a conclusion that skill-based education needs to be effective and it involves systemic transformation of teacher training such as reformed teacher preparation, long-term professional development, technological and infrastructural support, collaborative and learning time, and institutional cultures that embrace innovation and continuous improvement.

References

Alizai, S. H., Asif, M., & Rind, Z. K. (2021). Relevance of motivational theories and firm health. International Journal of Management, 12(3), 1130–1137.

Alkureishi, M. A., Choo, Z. Y., Rahman, A., Ho, K., Benning-Shorb, J., Lenti, G., Velázquez Sánchez, I., Zhu, M., Shah, S. D., & Lee, W. W. (2021). Digitally disconnected: Qualitative study of patient perspectives on the digital divide and potential solutions. JMIR Human Factors, 8(4), Article e33364. https://doi.org/10.2196/33364

Aurangzeb, Asif, M., & Amin, M. K. (2021). Resources management and SME's performance. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviewshttps://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2021.9367

Aurangzeb, Mushtaque, T., Tunio, M. N., Zia-ur-Rehman, & Asif, M. (2021). Influence of administrative expertise of human resource practitioners on the job performance: Mediating role of achievement motivation. International Journal of Management, 12(4), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.12.4.2021.035

Avsec, S., & Jagiełło-Kowalczyk, M. (2021). Investigating possibilities of developing self-directed learning in architecture students using design thinking. Sustainability, 13(8), Article 4369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084369

Drossel, K., & Eickelmann, B. (2017). Teachers' participation in professional development concerning the implementation of new technologies in class: A latent class analysis of teachers and the relationship with the use of computers, ICT self-efficacy and emphasis on teaching ICT skills. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 5(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-017-0044-9

Gu, X., Crook, C., & Spector, M. (2019). Facilitating innovation with technology: Key actors in educational ecosystems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1141–1155. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12789

Hardie, B., Highfield, C., & Lee, K. (2020). Entrepreneurship education today for students' unknown futures. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2020064237

Istiningsih, I. (2022). Impact of ICT integration on the development of vocational high school teacher TPACK in the digital age 4.0. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i1.6642

Kim, C. J. H., & Padilla, A. M. (2020). Technology for educational purposes among low-income Latino children living in a mobile park in Silicon Valley: A case study before and during COVID-19. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 42(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986320946799

Masonbrink, A. R., & Hurley, E. (2020). Advocating for children during the COVID-19 school closures. Pediatrics, 146(3), Article e20201440. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-1440

Megayanti, T., Busono, T., & Maknun, J. (2020). Project-based learning efficacy in vocational education: Literature review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 830(4), Article 042075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/830/4/042075

Mezentceva, D. A., Dzhavlakh, E. S., Eliseeva, O. V., & Bagautdinova, A. S. (2020). On the question of pedagogical digital competence. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, 29(11), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-11-88-97

Muhali, M. (2019). Pembelajaran inovatif abad ke-21. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 3(2), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.31846/e-saintika.v3i2.167

Notanubun, Z. (2019). Pengembangan kompetensi profesionalisme guru di era digital (Abad 21). Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling Terapan, 3(2), 54–62.

Sánchez, S. P., Belmonte, J. L., Guerrero, A. J. M., & Hinojo-Lucena, F. J. (2020). Flipped learning y competencia digital: Una conexión docente necesaria para su desarrollo en la educación actual. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 23(2), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifp.429191

Sangrà, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., & Veletsianos, G. (2019). Lifelong learning ecologies: Linking formal and informal contexts of learning in the digital era. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1615–1618. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12837

Sayer, P., & Braun, D. (2020). The disparate impact of COVID-19 remote learning on English learners in the United States. TESOL Journal, 11(3), Article e00576. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.576

Septikasari, R. (2018). Keterampilan 4C abad 21 dalam pembelajaran pendidikan dasar. Tarbiyah Al-Awlad, 8(1), 1–10.

Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2017). Review of computer-based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12170

Smolyaninova, O. G., & Bezyzvestnykh, E. A. (2019). Professional training of teacher 4.0: Developing digital competency by means of ePortfolio. Continuum, 4, 45–56.

Author Biography

Muhammad Rafiq-uz-Zaman, Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Education, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalnagar Campus

Ph.D. Scholar,

Department of Education,

The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan,

Email: mrzmuslah@gmail.com

Downloads

Published

30-09-2023

How to Cite

Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M. (2023). Teacher Training Needs for Skill-Based Education: A Review of Competencies, Barriers, and Professional Development Gaps. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 2(3), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v2i3.212

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>