Comparative Analysis of Science Teachers’ Professionalism of Public and Private Secondary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v4i2.219Keywords:
Teacher Professionalism, Comparative Analysis, Public vs. Private Schools, Statistical Significance, Effect Size, Reliability Analysis, Professional DevelopmentAbstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of professionalism among science teachers in public and private secondary schools in District Muzaffarabad, employing a mixed-methods quantitative approach. Data were collected from 180 teachers (92 public, 88 private) and 340 students (162 from public, 178 from private schools) using validated self-report and student-perception questionnaires with high reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.89 and 0.87). Descriptive statistics revealed higher mean professionalism scores for private school teachers in both teacher self-reports (M = 4.60 vs. 4.40) and student evaluations (M = 4.30 vs. 3.90). Independent samples t-tests confirmed statistically significant differences between groups (teacher-reported: t(178) = 3.24, p = .043; student-reported: t(338) = 6.34, p = .040). Effect size analysis (Cohen’s d) indicated moderate to large practical differences, particularly in lesson preparation (d = 0.82), feedback delivery (d = 0.91), and dress code adherence (d = 1.12), all favouring private school teachers. Public school teachers scored higher in punctuality (d = 0.65) and conflict resolution (d = 0.53). Correlation analysis showed stronger alignment between teacher self-perception and student ratings in private schools (r = .62) than in public schools (r = .41). ANOVA results affirmed school type as a significant predictor of professionalism (F = 10.56, p = .002), with no significant gender interaction. The study concludes that private school science teachers demonstrate significantly higher professionalism in several observable domains, though both sectors exhibit strong ethical commitment. Recommendations include targeted professional development for public school teachers in lesson planning, feedback, and professional conduct, and for private school teachers in punctuality and conflict management.
References
Abbasi, N. N., Javed, M., & Naseem, A. (2021). A study of relationship between professionalism and teachers’ performance at secondary school level. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 1–12.
Alderman, H., Orazem, P. F., & Paterno, E. M. (2001). School quality, school cost, and the public/private school choices of low-income households in Pakistan. Journal of Human Resources, 36(2), 304–326.
Amobi, F. A. (2005). Pre-service teachers’ reflectivity on the sequence and consequences of teaching actions in a microteaching experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(1), 115–130.
Anam, F., Muharlisiani, L. T., Soewardini, H. M. D., & Purnomo, A. (2023). Reflections on 4F model learning for professionalism development of prospective teachers: Evidence from teacher professional education. Journal of Education Research, 4(4), 2498–2510. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v4i4.740
Azad, T. (2023). The Impact of Technology in the Classroom: An Insight into Students’ and Teachers’ Psychological Perspectives. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v2i2.30
Azhar, M., Hussain, M., & Bhatti, Z. I. (2019). Impact of school type on teachers’ professionalism: A comparative study. Journal of Educational Research, 22(2), 103–120.
Baba Gana, A., Alimi, O. S., & Ehinola, G. B. (2011). Job satisfaction among teachers: A comparative analysis in public and private secondary schools. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 6(2), 34–43.
Bedi, S., & Garg, A. (2000). The effectiveness of private versus public schools: The case of Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 61(2), 463–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00066-2
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2007). Variations in the conditions for teachers’ professional learning and development: Sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 423–443.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701450746
Demirkasımoğlu, N. (2010). Teacher professionalism from different perspectives. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 2047–2051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.444
Gao, Z., Hu, G., Akram, S., Ul Hassan, M., Shahzad, M. F., & Jan, S. A. (2025). Comparative analysis of managerial strategies for enhancing teacher motivation in Public and Private Schools. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 6272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90900-9
Gujjar, A. A., Naoreen, B., Saifi, S., & Bajwa, M. J. (2010). Teaching practice: Problems and issues in Pakistan. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 339–361.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 6(2), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/713698714
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031005003
Hussain, T., Hashmi, A., & Perveen, Z. (2020). Attitude towards teaching profession in Pakistan: A case of public sector secondary school teachers. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 4(2), 483–491.
Ingersoll, R. M., & Perda, D. (2008). The status of teaching as a profession. In J. Ballantine & J. Spade (Eds.), Schools and society: A sociological approach to education (pp. 106–118). Pine Forge Press.
Kalim, U., & Bibi, S. (2024). Assessing teacher competencies in public schools of Pakistan: A pathway for improving the effectiveness of professional development programs for teachers. SAGE Open, 14(2).
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241236060
Khakwani, S., Khalid, S., & Ahmad, M. (2022). Teachers’ professionalism: Exploring public-school teachers’ professionalism. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 4(3), 910–915.
MacBeath, J. (2012). The future of the teaching profession. Education International.
Malik, D. N., Tahira, D. . R., & Noreen, D. S. (2025). Investigating the Underlying Causes and Consequences of Gender-Based Violence: Exploring Effective Intervention and Prevention Strategies in Higher Educational Institutes. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v4i1.162
Mustafa, M. N. (2013). High school teacher professionalism in enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Asian Social Science, 9(12), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n12p168
Nadeem, H. A., & Iqbal, Z. (2023). Teachers’ professional skills and their corresponding school climates: A comparative analysis of professionally qualified and non-qualified teachers. Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 10(2), 1–12.
Nadeem, H. A., & Iqbal, Z. (2024). Investigating teachers’ professional dispositions and their corresponding school climates: A comparative analysis of qualified and non-qualified teachers. Jahan-e-Tahqeeq, 7(1), 1446–1459.
Nadeem, H. A., & Lilla, Z. I. (2024). Professional competence of teachers and school climate: A conceptual perspective. UMT Education Review, 7(1), 1–23.
Nawaz, N. (2013). Perspectives on the status of the teaching profession in Pakistan (Doctoral dissertation, University of Huddersfield).
Nursalim, M., Fahrurrozi, F., & Amin, M. (2020). Effect of teacher professionalism and competence on teacher performance and student learning outcomes. International Journal of Research and Review, 7(11), 419–426. https://www.ijrrjournal.com
OECD. (2020). Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals: TALIS 2018 results (Vol. 2). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en
Ogunwuyi, O., Adesope, A. O., & Bakare, K. M. (2024). Teachers’ roles in enhancing professionalism in the education industry. International Journal of Research in Education and Sustainable Development, 4(5),122–128. https://www.openjournals.ijaar.org
Rizvi, M., & Elliott, B. (2007). Enhancing and sustaining teacher professionalism in Pakistan. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600601106095
Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Open University Press.
Tariq, M. N., John, S., Ishaque, M. S., & Burfat, G. M. (2012). A comparative study of public and private school head teachers’ vision for school improvement. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(1), 174–183.
Tooley, J., Dixon, P., & Olaniyan, O. (2005). Private and public schooling in low-income areas of Lagos State, Nigeria: A census and comparative survey. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.05.001
Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2016). The role of feedback from the school leader during teacher evaluation for teacher and school improvement. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(1), 6–24.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203770
Zeeshan, M., ul Ain, Q., & Murtaza, H. (2024). Impact of professionalism on professional development of secondary school teachers. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 5(3), 614–622.
https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2024(5-III)55
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671
Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (2014). Reflective teaching: An introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Zhou, S., & Hou, H. (2025). The interplay of self-efficacy, grit, and metacognition in shaping work engagement among EFL teachers: a comparative study of Mainland China and Hong Kong. BMC psychology, 13(1), 468. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02761-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Hamid Ali Nadeem, Dr. Arshad Mehmood Qamar , Kashif Aziz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The work is concurrently licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship and the work's original publication in this journal, while the authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.