Development or Post-Development Narrative: What Do We Know About it and the Way Forward

Authors

  • Bridget Acquah Akobima M/A Basic School, Ghana
  • Ernest Darkwa Seven Hearts Ghana
  • Constance Osafo-Adjei

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1022/ijss.v3i1.59

Keywords:

Development, Post-development, Alternatives, Remaking, Capitalist, Modern

Abstract

This paper investigates the post-development narrative, taking into account its primary foundations, strengths, and weaknesses.  The paper is divided into six sections. After the introduction, the second section discusses the paper's methodology, and the third section examines the development and fundamental principles of post-development. The fourth segment explores some of the criticisms posed by post-development theorists against development. The post-development alternatives and contributions are examined in the fifth part. The paper's conclusion provides a summary of post-development's fundamental principles and a roadmap for future growth.

References

Escobar, A. (2004). Beyond the Third World: Imperial Globality, Global Coloniality and Anti-Globalization Social Movements. Third World Quarterly, 25(1) 207-230.

Esteva, G. and Prakash, M.S. (1998). Grassroots Post-Modernism. Remaking the Soil of Cultures. London: Zed Books.

Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Escobar, A. (1984). Discourse and Power in Development: Michael Foucault and the Relevance of his work to the Third World. Alternatives, 10: 337-400.

Gulalp, H. (1998). The Eurocentrism of Dependency Theory and The Question of Authenticity: A View from Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 19(5): 951-961.

Latouche, S. (2011). Veers Une Societe D’abondance Frugale. Paris, France: Fayard.

Latouche, S. (2010). De-growth. Journal of Cleaner Production 18(6): 519-522.

Latouche, S. (2009). Farewell to Growth. Cambridge. Polity Press.

Latouche, S. (2004). Why Less should be so much More: De-growth Economics. Le-Monde Diplomatique.

Latouche, S. (1986). Fault-il refuser le Development? Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Marglin, S. A. (1990). Towards the Decolonization of the Mind, in Marglin, A. F. and Marglin, S. (eds), Dominating Knowledge, Development, Culture and Resistance, pp 1-28. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Mies, M. and Shiva, V. (1993). Ecofeminism. London. Zed Books.

Mignolo, W. D. and Escobar, A. (eds). (2013). Globalization and Decolonization Option. London: England, Routledge.

Nanda, M. (1999). Who need Post-Development? Discourses of Difference, Green Revolution and Agrarian Populism in India. Journal of Development Studies 15(1), 1-31.

Nandy, A. (1986). The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self under Colonialism. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Power, M. (2003). Rethinking Development Geographies. London: England: Routledge.

Rahnema, M. and Bawtree, V. (eds) (1997). The Post-development Reader. Cape Town: South Africa. David Philip.

Rist, G. (1997). The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith. London: Zed Books.

Sachs, W. (2002). Fairness in Fragile World: The Johannesburg Agenda. Development 45(3): 12-17.

Sachs, W. (ed) (1992). The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books.

Schuurman, F.J. (1993). Beyond the Impasse: New Directions in Development Theory. London: Zed Books.

Sally, J. M. (2017). Post-Development Theory. Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of International Studies.

Sharp, J. and Briggs, J. (2006). Post-Colonialism and Development: New Dialogues? Geographical Journal, 172(1): 6-9.

Simon, D. (2006). Separated by Common Ground? Bringing Post-development and post-colonialism together. Geographical Journal, 172(1): 10-21.

Simon, D. (2003). Dilemmas of Development and Environment in a Globalising World: Theory, Policy, and Praxis. Progress in Development Studies, 3(1): 5-41.

Simon, D. (1997). Development Reconsidered: New Directions in Development Thinking. Geografiska Annaler Series B. Human Geography, 79(4): 183-201.

Storey, A. (2000). Post-development Theory: Romanticism and Pontius Pilate Politics. Development 43(4): 40-46.

Ziai, A. (2007). Exploring Post-development: Theory and Practice, Problems and Perspectives. London: Routledge.

Published

12-01-2024

How to Cite

Acquah, B., Darkwa, E., & Osafo-Adjei, C. (2024). Development or Post-Development Narrative: What Do We Know About it and the Way Forward. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1022/ijss.v3i1.59

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)